Đánh giá vga k1000m và k1100m năm 2024

Địa chỉ : 50 Nguyễn Xuân Khoát, P. Tân Thành, Q. Tân Phú, TPHCM

Điện thoại : 028 3812 3816 - Hotline : 0909 212 772

Email : [email protected]

Website : www.econnect.com.vn

Giấy chứng nhận ĐKKD số: 4102051249 do sở Kế Hoạch và Đầu Tư cấp ngày 19/06/2006

+ CHUYÊN CUNG CẤP CÁC LOẠI CARD VGA CHO LAPTOP WORKSTATION GAMING NHƯ DELL, HP, LENOVO, ASUS.

– Card VGA Quadro K1100m chuyên lắp cho Laptop HP Zbook 15 G2 G1, Dell Precision M4800

Tên VGA K1100m N15p-Q1-A2 Pipelines 384 – unified Core Speed 705 MHz Memory Speed 2800 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 2048 MB Shared Memory no DirectX DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 Transistor Count 1270 Million technology 28 nm Features Optimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, OpenCL 1.2, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play

Quý khách được lắp đặt và bôi keo tản nhiệt chuyên dùng miến phí tại ACLAPTOP

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192Core clock speed705 MHz850 MHzNumber of transistors1,270 million1,270 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 WattTexture fill rate22.5913.60Floating-point performance542.2 gflops326.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K1000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sizedInterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed2800 MHz1800 MHzMemory bandwidth44.8 GB/s28.8 GB/sShared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputsDisplay Port1.2no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++3D Vision Pro+no dataMosaic+no datanView Display Management+no dataOptimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)Shader Model55.1OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan++CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 39% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 39% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 74% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 66% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 75% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 87% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 65% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

K1100M outperforms K1000M by 80% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K1000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 18 Mh/s 10 Mh/s

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12−14 9 Full HD18

+0%

18

+0%

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 20775−6 4−5

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey4−5

+100%

2−3

−100%

Battlefield 56−7

+100%

3−4

−100%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14

+9.1%

10−12

−9.1%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+25%

4−5

−25%

Far Cry 54−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Far Cry New Dawn4−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Forza Horizon 49−10

+50%

6−7

−50%

Hitman 35−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Horizon Zero Dawn4−5

+100%

2−3

−100%

Red Dead Redemption 26−7

+20%

5−6

−20%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10

+12.5%

8−9

−12.5%

Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey4−5

+100%

2−3

−100%

Battlefield 56−7

+100%

3−4

−100%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14

+9.1%

10−12

−9.1%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+25%

4−5

−25%

Far Cry 54−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Far Cry New Dawn4−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Forza Horizon 49−10

+50%

6−7

−50%

Hitman 35−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Horizon Zero Dawn4−5

+100%

2−3

−100%

Metro Exodus3−4

+50%

2−3

−50%

Red Dead Redemption 26−7

+20%

5−6

−20%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10

+12.5%

8−9

−12.5%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7

+40%

5−6

−40%

Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey4−5

+100%

2−3

−100%

Battlefield 56−7

+100%

3−4

−100%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+25%

4−5

−25%

Far Cry 54−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Far Cry New Dawn4−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Forza Horizon 49−10

+50%

6−7

−50%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt4

−25%

5−6

+25%

Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare5−6

+25%

4−5

−25%

Hitman 36−7

+20%

5−6

−20%

Horizon Zero Dawn8−9

+14.3%

7−8

−14.3%

Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 21−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6

+25%

4−5

−25%

1440p Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 20771−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Far Cry 54−5 2−3 Forza Horizon 42−3 1−2

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Hitman 33−4

+50%

2−3

−50%

Horizon Zero Dawn6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

Red Dead Redemption 21−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K Ultra Preset

Far Cry 53−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

Far Cry New Dawn6−7 5−6 Forza Horizon 43−4 2−3


This is how K1100M and K1000M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • K1100M is 33.3% faster than K1000M

1080p resolution:

  • K1000M is 0% faster than K1100M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the K1100M is 300% faster than the K1000M.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K1000M is 25% faster than the K1100M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • K1100M is ahead in 40 tests (85%)
  • K1000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (13%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.80 2.02 Recency 23 July 2013 1 June 2012 Cost $109.94 $119.9 Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 192 Memory bandwidth 44.8 28.8

The Quadro K1100M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Quadro K1100M

Quadro K1000M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

Đánh giá vga k1000m và k1100m năm 2024

Đánh giá vga k1000m và k1100m năm 2024

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

Đánh giá vga k1000m và k1100m năm 2024

Đánh giá vga k1000m và k1100m năm 2024

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.