Chúng tôi so sánh một GPU Nền tảng di động: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M và một GPU Nền tảng máy tính để bàn: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v. Show
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640CUDA cores1024640Core clock speed944 MHz1020 MHzBoost clock speed950 / 1151 MHz1085 MHzNumber of transistors2,940 million1,870 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)unknown60 WattTexture fill rate73.6043.40Floating-point performance2,355 gflops1,389 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce GTX 965M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizelargeno dataBus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16Lengthno data5.7" (14.5 cm)Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)Widthno data2-slotSupplementary power connectorsNoneNoneSLI options+no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed2500 MHz5.4 GB/sMemory bandwidth80 GB/s86.4 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIMulti monitor supportno data4 displaysVGA аnalog display support+no dataDisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no dataHDMI++HDCPno data+Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536G-SYNC support+no dataAudio input for HDMIno dataInternal TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Blu Ray 3Dno data+3D Gamingno data+3D Visionno data+GameStream+no dataGeForce ShadowPlay+no dataGPU Boost2.0no dataGameWorks+no dataH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no dataOptimus+no data3D Vision Liveno data+BatteryBoost+no dataAnsel+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)Shader Model6.45.1OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.11.2Vulkan1.11.1.126CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 750 Ti outperforms 965M by 4% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 750 Ti outperforms 965M by 4% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 9% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 36% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 29% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 11% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 27% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 70% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 11% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 22% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 14% in Octane Render OctaneBench. Unigine Heaven 4.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013. Benchmark coverage: 1% 965M outperforms 750 Ti by 6% in Unigine Heaven 4.0. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 965M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 226 Mh/s 183 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 0.51 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 2.3 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.25 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 74.4 Sol/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD46 50 1440p25 24−27 4K21 +0% 21−24 +0% Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207714−16 16−18 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey31 +47.6% 21−24 −47.6% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 −7.1% 14−16 +7.1% Battlefield 552 +52.9% 30−35 −52.9% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare24−27 −3.8% 27−30 +3.8% Cyberpunk 207714−16 −6.7% 16−18 +6.7% Far Cry 538 +52% 24−27 −52% Far Cry New Dawn38 +40.7% 27−30 −40.7% Forza Horizon 447 +34.3% 35−40 −34.3% Hitman 324−27 −4% 24−27 +4% Horizon Zero Dawn20−22 +0% 20−22 +0% Red Dead Redemption 216−18 +0% 16−18 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider31 +47.6% 21−24 −47.6% Watch Dogs: Legion16−18 −5.9% 18−20 +5.9% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24 +14.3% 21−24 −14.3% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 −7.1% 14−16 +7.1% Battlefield 543 +26.5% 30−35 −26.5% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare24−27 −3.8% 27−30 +3.8% Cyberpunk 207714−16 −6.7% 16−18 +6.7% Far Cry 535 +40% 24−27 −40% Far Cry New Dawn35 +29.6% 27−30 −29.6% Forza Horizon 441 +17.1% 35−40 −17.1% Hitman 324−27 −4% 24−27 +4% Horizon Zero Dawn20−22 +0% 20−22 +0% Metro Exodus15 +0% 14−16 +0% Red Dead Redemption 216−18 +0% 16−18 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider13 −61.5% 21−24 +61.5% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt31 +47.6% 21−24 −47.6% Watch Dogs: Legion16−18 −5.9% 18−20 +5.9% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey13 −61.5% 21−24 +61.5% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 −7.1% 14−16 +7.1% Battlefield 535 +2.9% 30−35 −2.9% Cyberpunk 207714−16 −6.7% 16−18 +6.7% Far Cry 532 +28% 24−27 −28% Far Cry New Dawn32 +18.5% 27−30 −18.5% Forza Horizon 428 −25% 35−40 +25% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt18 −16.7% 21−24 +16.7% Watch Dogs: Legion16−18 −5.9% 18−20 +5.9% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare14−16 −7.1% 14−16 +7.1% Hitman 314−16 −6.7% 16−18 +6.7% Horizon Zero Dawn14−16 +0% 14−16 +0% Metro Exodus8−9 +0% 8−9 +0% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +0% 7−8 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider12−14 +0% 12−14 +0% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey10 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Battlefield 516−18 −6.3% 16−18 +6.3% Cyberpunk 20775−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Far Cry 522 +37.5% 16−18 −37.5% Far Cry New Dawn16−18 −6.3% 16−18 +6.3% Forza Horizon 416−18 −5.9% 18−20 +5.9% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt10−11 +0% 10−11 +0% Watch Dogs: Legion4−5 −25% 5−6 +25% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare6−7 −16.7% 7−8 +16.7% Hitman 39−10 +0% 9−10 +0% Horizon Zero Dawn9−10 +0% 9−10 +0% Metro Exodus3−4 −33.3% 4−5 +33.3% Red Dead Redemption 25−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6 +0% 5−6 +0% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt13 +62.5% 8−9 −62.5% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey3 −66.7% 5−6 +66.7% Assassin's Creed Valhalla4−5 +0% 4−5 +0% Battlefield 58−9 +0% 8−9 +0% Cyberpunk 20771−2 +0% 1−2 +0% Far Cry 510 +25% 8−9 −25% Far Cry New Dawn31 +182% 10−12 −182% Forza Horizon 414 +16.7% 12−14 −16.7% Watch Dogs: Legion3−4 +0% 3−4 +0% This is how GTX 965M and GTX 750 Ti compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 9.71 10.05 Recency 5 January 2015 18 February 2014 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1024 640 Memory bandwidth 80 86.4 We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 965M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti. The differences in performance seem too small. Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 965M GeForce GTX 750 Ti Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
